期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2026; 5: (8) ; 155-158 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jacn.20260440.

Evaluation of the application of pain and sedation nursing model in ICU patients
ICU患者镇痛镇静护理模式的应用评价

作者: 李娜, 杨从燕 *

云南省滇南中心医院(红河州第一人民医院) 云南个旧

*通讯作者: 杨从燕,单位:云南省滇南中心医院(红河州第一人民医院) 云南个旧 ;

发布时间: 2026-08-09 总浏览量: 15

摘要

目的 探讨基于重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)-里士满躁动-镇静量表(RASS)联合多维度个体化镇痛镇静护理模式在ICU患者中的应用效果。方法 选取2023年1月至2025年12月本院ICU收治的120例需镇痛镇静治疗的患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和实验组各60例。对照组实施常规镇痛镇静护理,实验组采用CPOT-RASS联合多维度个体化镇痛镇静护理模式,比较两组镇痛镇静达标率、不良反应发生率及患者睡眠质量评分。结果 实验组镇痛镇静达标率显著高于对照组(χ2=7.576,P=0.006);实验组不良反应发生率显著低于对照组(χ2=6.825,P=0.009);实验组睡眠质量评分显著高于对照组(t=12.894,P<0.001)。结论 CPOT-RASS联合多维度个体化镇痛镇静护理模式可精准把控ICU患者镇痛镇静深度,提升达标率,降低不良反应风险,改善患者睡眠质量,优化护理效果与患者预后,贴合ICU精准护理发展需求,具有较高的临床推广应用价值。

关键词: ICU患者;镇痛镇静;CPOT-RASS评分;个体化护理;应用评价

Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of a multidimensional individualized pain and sedation nursing model based on Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT)-Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) in ICU patients.
Methods A total of 120 patients requiring pain and sedation therapy admitted to the ICU of our hospital from January 2023 to December 2025 were selected as the study subjects. They were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group of 60 cases each using a random number table. The control group received conventional pain and sedation nursing, while the experimental group adopted the CPOT-RASS combined with multidimensional individualized pain and sedation nursing model. The achievement rates of pain and sedation, incidence of adverse reactions, and patient sleep quality scores were compared between the two groups.
Results The achievement rate of pain and sedation in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (χ2=7.576, P=0.006). The incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2=6.825, P=0.009). The sleep quality score in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (t=12.894, P<0.001).
Conclusion   The CPOT-RASS combined with multidimensional individualized pain and sedation nursing model can precisely control the depth of pain and sedation in ICU patients, improve the achievement rate, reduce the risk of adverse reactions, enhance patient sleep quality, optimize nursing outcomes and patient prognosis, and align with the development needs of precision nursing in ICU. It has high clinical application and promotion value.

Key words: ICU patients; Analgesia and sedation; CPOT-RASS score; Individualized care; Application evaluation

参考文献 References

[1] 张晶.以护士为主导的程序化镇静镇痛护理在ICU多发伤患者中的应用[J].当代医药论丛,2025,23(34):183-185.

[2] 金花,杜亚平.以ICU护士为主导的程序化镇痛镇静方案结合预见性护理干预对ICU多发伤患者康复情况的影响[A]关爱生命大讲堂之生命关怀与智慧康养系列学术研讨会论文集(下)—高血压与主动脉疾病专题[C].中国生命关怀协会,中国生命关怀协会,2025:3.

[3] 陈喜.目标性镇痛镇静护理模式在ICU机械通气患者中的应用效果[J].现代养生,2025,25(13):1024-1027.

[4] 陈荣超,王晶晶.基于FMEA模式的护理干预对ICU气管插管机械通气患者康复和镇静镇痛的影响[J].当代医药论丛,2025,23(11):162-164.

[5] 吉永桂,姚冬梅.ICU机械通气患者应用集束化镇痛镇静护理模式的效果评价[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2025, 42(01):35-36.

[6] 苏丹,王启蒙,宋宏.基于PDCA模式的镇痛镇静护理对ICU患者护理质量影响观察[J].航空航天医学杂志, 2024,35(01):85-88.

[7] 王文思,杨友英.镇静镇痛集束化管理在ICU患者护理中的应用效果评价[J].人人健康,2019,(24):129-130.

[8] 史雨鑫,常晓媛,许华.评价ICU患者应用程序化镇痛镇静护理策略的干预效果[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2018,3(32):154+158.


引用本文

李娜, 杨从燕, ICU患者镇痛镇静护理模式的应用评价[J]. 临床护理进展, 2026; 5: (8) : 155-158.