Effect analysis of emergency rapid nursing process on the rescue rate of patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage
急诊快捷护理流程对急性脑出血患者救治率的效果分析

摘要

目的 探究急性脑出血用急诊快捷护理流程的作用。方法 选择数字随机表法，均分本院急诊科2024年11月-2025年10月收治的急性脑出血病人（N=62）。试验组采取急诊快捷护理流程，对照组行常规护理流程。对比HAMA评分等指标。结果 关于HAMA和HAMD评分：干预后：试验组（9.01±2.76）分、（10.33±3.01）分，对照组（14.27±3.05）分、（15.38±3.74）分，差异显著（P＜0.05）。救治成功率：试验组100.0%，对照组90.32%，差异显著（P＜0.05）。分诊评估、确诊与救治时间：试验组（2.03±0.39）min、（18.11±2.17）min、（39.86±6.48）min，对照组（3.93±0.52）min、（27.95±4.68）min、（59.27±8.14）min，差异显著（P＜0.05）。结论 急性脑出血病人用急诊快捷护理流程，其救治效率与心态均显著改善。

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of the emergency rapid nursing process on the treatment rate and psychological state of patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage.
Methods Using the digital random table method, 62 patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage admitted to the emergency department of our hospital from November 2024 to October 2025 were evenly divided into the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group received the emergency rapid nursing process, while the control group received the routine nursing process. The HAMA score and other indicators were compared.
Results Regarding the HAMA and HAMD scores: After intervention: the experimental group (9.01 ± 2.76) points, (10.33 ± 3.01) points, the control group (14.27 ± 3.05) points, (15.38 ± 3.74) points, the difference was significant (P < 0.05). Treatment success rate: the experimental group 100.0%, the control group 90.32%, the difference was significant (P < 0.05). Time of triage assessment, diagnosis and treatment: the experimental group (2.03 ± 0.39) min, (18.11 ± 2.17) min, (39.86 ± 6.48) min, the control group (3.93 ± 0.52) min, (27.95 ± 4.68) min, (59.27 ± 8.14) min, the difference was significant (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   For patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage, using the emergency rapid nursing process, their treatment efficiency and psychological state have been significantly improved.