期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2025; 4: (8) ; 137-140 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jacn.20250423.

Investigation of the difference in gastric residual volume in patients in ICU under three different positions
ICU患者在三种不同体位下的胃残余量差异性研究

作者: 苗玉 *, 吴丽, 肖昱, 王尔钰, 黄绮华

暨南大学附属广东省第二人民医院 广东深圳

*通讯作者: 苗玉,单位:暨南大学附属广东省第二人民医院 广东深圳;

发布时间: 2025-08-30 总浏览量: 313

摘要

目的 探讨重症监护病房(ICU)患者三种不同体位下的胃残余量(GRV)差异性。方法 纳入本院2024年8月~2024年10月ICU收治患者共150例,全部患者分别采取半卧位(床头抬高30°)、平卧位、右侧卧位(侧卧30°),采用注射抽吸法测量三种体位的GRV。同时按照不同胃管置入深度、不同鼻饲速度分为亚组,对比三种体位的GRV。结果 (1)三种体位的GRV对比,组间不具备统计学差异(P>0.05)。(2)不同胃管置入深度下三种体位的GRV对比,组间不具备统计学差异(P>0.05)。(3)不同鼻饲深速度下三种体位的GRV对比,组间不具备统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 不同体位对于ICU患者GRV不会表现出显著差异,同时不同胃管置入深度、不同鼻饲速度均不会影响三种体位的GRV。

关键词: 胃残余量;体位;重症监护病房;肠内营养;注射器抽吸法

Abstract

Objective To investigate the in gastric residual volume (GRV) in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) under three different positions.
Methods A total of 150 patients admitted the ICU of our hospital from August to October 2024 were included. All patients were placed in three different positions: semi-reclining position (with the of the bed elevated by 30°), supine position, and right lateral position (lateral position by 30°). The GRV of the three was measured using the injection suction method. At the same time, the patients were divided into subgroups according to different depths of gastric tube placement and different speeds of enteral, and the GRV of the three positions was compared.
Results (1) Comparison of GRV among the three positions showed no statistically significant difference between groups (P>005). (2) Comparison of GRV among the three positions at different depths of gastric tube placement showed no statistically significant difference between groups (P>0.0). (3) Comparison of GRV among the three positions at different speeds of enteral nutrition showed no statistically significant difference between groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion   Different positions do not show significant differences in GRV in ICU patients, and different depths of gastric tube placement and different speeds of enteral nutrition do not affect the V of the three positions.

Key words: Gastric residual volume; Position; Intensive care unit; Enteral nutrition; Injection suction

参考文献 References

[1] 余昆容,李梅,赵淑雅,等.注射器抽吸监测胃残余量对ICU病人呕吐、摄入热量及预后影响研究[J].肠外与肠内营养,2021,28(02):95-99.

[2] 钟莉,陆文明,董朝晖,等. 超声监测胃残余量对危重症患者肠内营养的疗效观察[J]. 中国现代医生,2020,58(1): 116-120.

[3] 胡慧宇,江丽云,胡浩泽,等. 不同胃残余量对ICU肠内营养患者喂养达标率的影响及危险因素分析[J]. 护士进修杂志,2024,39(7):711-715. 

[4] Yasuda H, Kondo N, Yamamoto R, et al. Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021,9(9):CD013335.

[5] 胡朝敏,赵渊春. 超声测定胃残余量与注射器抽吸测定对ICU患者早期肠内营养评估的效果研究[J]. 科技与健康,2024,3(14):29-32.

[6] 赵媛媛,杜立强,崔朝勃,等. 床旁超声监测胃残余量在AECOPD患者早期肠内营养中的应用[J]. 国际呼吸杂志, 2021, 41(13):993-997. 

[7] Brito HP, Sugai B, Chaves FT, et al GASTRIC RESIDUAL VOLUME FACTORS AFTER BOWEL PREPARATION WITH MANNITOL EXPRESS[J]. Arq Gastroenterol. 2021,58(2):180-184.

[8] Khandekar SS, Doctor JR, Awaskar SK, et al. Ultrasound-guided estimation of gastric residual volume using Perlas's formula: A validation study in patients[J]. Indian J Anaesth. 2022,66(4):255-259.

[9] 刘宁,李琦,孙伟生. 床旁超声胃残余量监测在ICU重症脑卒中患者肠内营养实施中的应用研究[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2023,34(9):1355-1357.

[10] 江洁,罗倩,朱宝华,等. 床旁超声胃窦双径法预估胃残余量指导老年重症病人肠内营养实施的临床研究[J]. 肠外与肠内营养,2022,29(5):280-284. 

[11] 冯丽梅,沈梅芬,陶云娜,等. 不同喂养状态及体位下注射器抽吸与超声测量胃残留量一致性评价[J]. 护理学杂志,2019,34(18):51-54. 

[12] 田飞,米元元,刘静兰,等.超声监测胃残余量对重症患者肠内营养效果的Meta分析[J].解放军护理杂志,2021, 38(10):47-53+72.

[13] Jenkins B, Calder PC, Marino LV. Gastric residual volume monitoring practices in UK intensive care units: A web-based survey[J]. J Intensive Care Soc. 2023,25(2):156-163.

[14] 余昆容,李梅,赵淑雅,等. 注射器抽吸监测胃残余量对ICU病人呕吐、摄入热量及预后影响研究[J]. 肠外与肠内营养,2021,28(2):95-99.

引用本文

苗玉, 吴丽, 肖昱, 王尔钰, 黄绮华, ICU患者在三种不同体位下的胃残余量差异性研究[J]. 临床护理进展, 2025; 4: (8) : 137-140.