Research on multidisciplinary collaborative nursing of skin injuries in rheumatic and immune diseases
多学科协作护理风湿免疫疾病皮肤损伤的研究

摘要

目的 将风湿免疫疾病合并皮肤损伤患者纳入研究，分析多学科协作护理的临床应用效果。方法 选取我院2024年1月-2025年1月100例风湿免疫疾病合并皮肤损伤患者，判定符合纳入标准后借助电脑随机抽选的形式进行分组（等分两组），以此达到区别护理干预后的效果对比。参照组行常规护理，研究组行多学科协作护理，对比两组护理效果差异，统计分析两组皮肤损伤愈合时间、疼痛评分、并发症发生率、护理满意度各项数据。结果 数据显示，研究组皮肤损伤愈合时间低于参照组；研究组疼痛评分低于参照组；研究组并发症发生率低于参照组；研究组护理总满意度高于参照组；各数据组间对比存在明显差异，以研究组优势性显著（P＜0.05）。结论 多学科协作护理的临床应用更利于风湿免疫疾病合并皮肤损伤患者伤口愈合，缩短愈合时间，减轻临床疼痛感，增强治疗舒适度，同时可降低并发症的发生，提高临床安全性，效果得到医护患认可，应用价值较高，值得推广。

Abstract

Objective To include patients with rheumatic immune diseases complicated with skin injuries in the study and analyze the clinical application effect of multidisciplinary collaborative nursing.
Methods A total of 100 patients with rheumatic and immune diseases complicated with skin injuries in our hospital from January 2024 to January 2025 were selected. After determining that they met the inclusion criteria, they were randomly grouped by computer (divided into two equal groups) to achieve the effect comparison after differentiated nursing intervention. The reference group received routine care, while the study group received multidisciplinary collaborative care. The differences in the care effects between the two groups were compared, and the data of skin injury healing time, pain score, incidence of complications, and care satisfaction in the two groups were statistically analyzed.
Results Data showed that the healing time of skin injuries in the study group was lower than that in the reference group. The pain score of the research group was lower than that of the reference group. The incidence of complications in the study group was lower than that in the reference group. The total satisfaction of nursing in the research group was higher than that in the reference group. There were significant differences among the data groups, with the study group having a significant dominance (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   The clinical application of multidisciplinary collaborative nursing is more conducive to wound healing in patients with rheumatic and immune diseases complicated with skin injuries, shortens the healing time, reduces clinical pain, enhances treatment comfort, and at the same time can reduce the occurrence of complications and improve clinical safety. The effect has been recognized by medical staff, patients and doctors, and has high application value, which is worthy of promotion.