期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2025; 4: (2) ; 129-131 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jacn.20250088.

The diagnostic value of blood routine combined with C-reactive protein test in distinguishing bacterial and viral infections in children
血常规联合C反应蛋白检验对小儿细菌感染与病毒感染的鉴别诊断价值

作者: 罗变红 *

甘肃陇西县第二人民医院 甘肃定西

*通讯作者: 罗变红,单位:甘肃陇西县第二人民医院 甘肃定西;

发布时间: 2025-02-25 总浏览量: 22

摘要

目的 分析血常规联合C反应蛋白检验对小儿细菌感染与病毒感染的鉴别诊断价值。方法 将2022.08月至2024.08月到医院诊治的44例小儿细菌感染患儿当作研究组,另挑选同时间段内到医院诊治的42例小儿病毒感染患儿归类到对照组,所有入选对象均进行血常规检验、C反应蛋白检验。对比两组的检验结果,观察血常规、C反应蛋白单独与联合检测的阳性检出率。结果 在白细胞计数、中性粒细胞、C反应蛋白上,研究组均高于对照组(P<0.05)。在白细胞计数、中性粒细胞、C反应蛋白及血常规+C反应蛋白的阳性检出率上,研究组显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 血常规C反应蛋白用于小儿细菌感染与病毒感染的鉴别诊断价值较高,临床可进一步推广应用。

关键词: 小儿细菌感染;病毒感染;血常规;C反应蛋白

Abstract

Objective To analyze the differential diagnostic value of blood routine combined with C-reactive protein test for bacterial and viral infections in children.
Methods 44 children with bacterial infections who received treatment at the hospital from August 2022 to August 2024 were selected as the study group, while 42 children with viral infections who received treatment at the hospital during the same period were classified as the control group. All selected subjects underwent blood routine tests and C-reactive protein tests. Compare the test results of two groups and observe the positive detection rates of blood routine and C-reactive protein detection alone and in combination.
Results In terms of white blood cell count, neutrophils, and C-reactive protein, the study group was higher than the control group (P<0.05). The positive detection rates of white blood cell count, neutrophils, C-reactive protein, and blood routine+C-reactive protein in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   C-reactive protein in blood routine has high diagnostic value for distinguishing bacterial and viral infections in children, and can be further promoted and applied in clinical practice.

Key words: Pediatric bacterial infection; Viral infection; Routine blood test; C-reactive protein

参考文献 References

[1] 李伟清,黄玉林,周玉航.血常规联合C反应蛋白检验在小儿感染类型鉴别诊断中的价值分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2021,15(12):90-92.

[2] 董金平.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在感染性疾病诊断中的价值[J].航空航天医学杂志,2023,34(9): 1050-1052.

[3] 陈江木.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在感染性疾病诊断中的价值研究[J].中国现代药物应用,2023, 17(5): 88-91.

[4] 黄丽华,肖明辉.血常规联合C反应蛋白检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2024,37(17): 73-76.

[5] 郭羡虾.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在感染性疾病诊断中的价值分析[J].黑龙江中医药,2024,53(3):94-96.

[6] 钟佑娇.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在儿童感染性疾病中的诊断价值[J].中国现代药物应用,2024,18(11): 86-89.

[7] 易思明,易惠茹.全血C反应蛋白与血常规联合检验在儿科细菌性感染性疾病中的诊断价值[J].黑龙江医药, 2023,36(02):423-425.

[8] 张爱芬.血常规结合C反应蛋白检验在鉴别诊断小儿细菌感染与病毒感染中的临床价值[J].黔南民族医专学报,2021,34(3):195-196.

[9] 谢丽玲.血常规联合C反应蛋白检验对小儿细菌感染与病毒感染的鉴别诊断价值[J].黑龙江医药科学,2023, 46(6): 183-184.

[10] 赖丽贤,江永欣,黄沉.儿童细菌感染性疾病应用CRP+血常规检验的诊断效果分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2024, 18(22):93-95.

[11] 陈小燕.血白细胞计数、C反应蛋白、白介素-6联合检测在儿科感染性疾病诊断中的应用[J].医学信息,2024, 37(22): 169-172.

引用本文

罗变红, 血常规联合C反应蛋白检验对小儿细菌感染与病毒感染的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 临床护理进展, 2025; 4: (2) : 129-131.