期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2025; 4: (1) ; 113-115 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jacn.20250036.

Analysis of the effect of clinical nursing pathway in cerebral infarction nursing
临床护理路径在脑梗塞护理中的效果分析

作者: 罗婷婷 *

平湖市独山港镇中心卫生院 浙江平湖

*通讯作者: 罗婷婷,单位:平湖市独山港镇中心卫生院 浙江平湖;

发布时间: 2025-01-28 总浏览量: 80

摘要

目的 分析临床护理路径用于脑梗塞的价值。方法 随机均分2022年10月-2024年9月本院接诊脑梗塞病人(n=76)。试验组采取临床护理路径,对照组行常规护理。对比并发症等指标。结果 关于FMA评分:干预后,试验组(84.15±2.79)分,对照组(73.68±3.51)分,差异显著(P<0.05)。总有效率:试验组94.74%,对照组78.95%,差异显著(P<0.05)。发生率:试验组2.63%,对照组18.42%,差异显著(P<0.05)。住院时间:试验组(7.45±1.39)d,对照组(9.94±1.82)d,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论 脑梗塞病人采用临床护理路径,效果显著,并发症也更少,住院时间更短,肢体运动功能改善情况更好。

关键词: 临床护理路径;并发症;脑梗塞;肢体运动功能

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of clinical nursing pathway in the treatment of cerebral infarction.
Methods Randomly divide patients with cerebral infarction admitted to our hospital from October 2022 to September 2024 (n=76). The experimental group adopted a clinical nursing pathway, while the control group received routine nursing care. Compare indicators such as complications.
Results Regarding FMA score: After intervention, the experimental group scored (84.15 ± 2.79) points, while the control group scored (73.68 ± 3.51) points, with a significant difference (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 94.74% in the experimental group and 78.95% in the control group, with a significant difference (P<0.05). The incidence rate was 2.63% in the experimental group and 18.42% in the control group, with a significant difference (P<0.05).Hospitalization time: The experimental group (7.45 ± 1.39) days and the control group (9.94 ± 1.82) days, with a significant difference (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Clinical nursing pathway has significant effects on patients with cerebral infarction, with fewer complications, shorter hospitalization time, and better improvement in limb motor function.

Key words: Clinical nursing pathway; Complication; Cerebral infarction; Limb motor function

参考文献 References

[1] 王宇. 社区综合康复护理路径在脑梗塞伴偏瘫患者中的应用效果分析[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2021,32(11):1839-1840.

[2] 孙姗姗. 社区综合康复护理路径在脑梗塞伴偏瘫患者中的应用效果分析[J]. 智慧健康,2023,9(26):257-260. 

[3] 张晓宇,高书理,白亚娟. 品管圈活动联合临床护理路径模式护理对脑梗塞恢复期患者的影响[J]. 黑龙江医学,2022,46(5):630-632. 

[4] 傅莉莉. 品管圈应用临床护理路径对脑梗塞病人实施健康教育的作用评价[J]. 饮食保健,2021,17(33):238-239.

[5] 吴雅丽. 临床护理路径在脑梗塞护理中的效果分析[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2021, 21(9): 334-335. 

[6] 张亚会,张嘉丽,程晓晖. 品管圈应用临床护理路径对脑梗塞病人实施健康教育的效果观察[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志,2020,5(38):179-180.

[7] 藏妮娅,徐芳. 品管圈联合临床护理路径对脑梗塞患者健康知识知晓率及护理满意度的影响[J]. 养生保健指南,2020,21(32):167.

[8] 黄桂香,王艳,陈春梅. 在脑梗塞患者康复功能锻炼中运用临床护理路径的效果[J]. 饮食保健,2020,8(39):252.

[9] 梁英. 品管圈活动联合临床护理路径模式护理在脑梗塞恢复期患者中的应用价值[J]. 临床研究,2023,31(1): 136-139. 

[10] 黄娟,唐春花. 临床护理路径模式联合品管圈活动在脑梗塞恢复期患者中的应用[J]. 湖北科技学院学报(医学版),2023,37(2):165-167.

引用本文

罗婷婷, 临床护理路径在脑梗塞护理中的效果分析[J]. 临床护理进展, 2025; 4: (1) : 113-115.