期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2024; 3: (11) ; 1-4 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jacn.20240436.

The application effect of nursing risk management model in the transport of critically ill patients
护理风险管理模式在急危重症病人转运中的应用效果

作者: 李国蓉, 朱敏 *, 卢文凤, 杨润清, 代修玲

四川省雅安市人民医院 四川雅安

*通讯作者: 朱敏,单位:四川省雅安市人民医院 四川雅安;

发布时间: 2024-11-25 总浏览量: 74

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估护理风险管理模式运用在急危重症病人转运途中的应用效果。方法 采用便利抽样法,选取2023年1月至2024年8月于雅安市人民医院急症科收治的120名急危重症病人,按入院时将其分为对照组和观察组,各60名。对照组实施常规转运护理,观察组实施护理风险管理模式,比较两组转运成功率、风险出现率、病人满意度。结果 经护理后,观察组病人的转运成功率(98.33%)显著高于对照组的(88.33%),风险出现率(1.67%)明显低于对照组(11.67%)。此外,观察组病人对护理工作的满意度也显著高于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 护理风险管理模式能显著降低转运风险,提高转运成功率,并提升护理满意度。

关键词: 急危重症病人;转运;护理风险管理模式;效果评估

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of nursing risk management model in the transport of critical patients.
Methods A total of 120 critically ill patients admitted to the emergency Department of Ya 'an People's Hospital from January 2023 to August 2024 were selected by convenience sampling method and divided into control group and observation group, with 60 patients in each group. The control group implemented routine transport nursing, and the observation group implemented nursing risk management mode. The success rate of transport, risk occurrence rate and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
Results After nursing, the success rate of transport in observation group (98.33%) was significantly higher than that in control group (88.33%), and the risk occurrence rate (1.67%) was significantly lower than that in control group (11.67%). In addition, the satisfaction of nursing work in the observation group was also significantly higher than that in the control group, with statistical significance (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Nursing risk management model can significantly reduce the risk of transport, improve the success rate of transport, and enhance nursing satisfaction.

Key words: Critically ill patients; Transport; Nursing risk management model; Effect evaluation

参考文献 References

[1] 陆清清,庄涛静,陈苏娟,等. 失效模式与效应分析的风险管理模式在妇产科急危重症转运患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(21):172-175.

[2] 谢超,张明阳,肖莹,祝晓迎.中医医院急危重症患者安全转运管理实践的应用与探讨[J].中国中医急症,2024,33(8):1481-1484,1491.

[3] Jia L,Wang H,Gao Y,et a1.High incidence of adverse events during intra-hospital transport of critically ill pa— tients and new related risk factors:a prospective,multi— center study in China[J].Crit Care,2016,20(1):1-13.

[4] 顾瑾,孙晓萍.呼吸科危重症院内转运患者实施分级转运模式的效果及对不良事件概率的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2021,40(13):2430-2433. 

[5] 李翠娥,黄建梅. 儿科急危重症患者转运过程中护理风险管理应用分析[J]. 中外医疗,2020,39(33):174-176.

[6] 史冬雷,刘晓颖,高健. 急诊危重症患者院内转运共识的实施要点[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志,2020,1(1):11-16.

[7] 急诊危重症患者院内转运共识专家组.急诊危重症患者院内转运共识——标准化分级转运方案[J].中国急救医学,2017,37(6):481-485.

[8] 俞宇虹,卢江炜. PDCA循环管理在急危重症孕产妇急诊转运中的应用效果[J]. 中国现代医生,2023,61(17):97-101.

[9] 傅国娟. 基于改良早期预警评分的转运管理在急危重症患者院内转运中的应用[J]. 中国现代医生,2023,61(7):69-72.

[10] 陈冬丽,石岩,李盛楠. 集束化护理方案对降低急危重症患者院内转运风险研究[J]. 山西卫生健康职业学院学报,2022,32(5):129-131.

[11] 李树亚,孙朋霞,华小雪,等. 急危重症患者院间转运决策最佳证据总结[J]. 中华护理杂志,2023,58(19):2416-2421.

[12] 方翔. 早期预警评分护理联合车载呼吸机转运护理在急危重症患者院前急救中的应用效果[J]. 中国民康医学,2023,35(19):168-170,174.

[13] 孙朋霞,李树亚,华小雪,等. 急危重症患者院间转运护理质量评价指标的构建[J]. 中华护理杂志,2023,58(15):1831-1837.

[14] 晏菁,许歌,李雪. 分级管理模式在急危重症患者CT检查护理中的应用[J]. 河南医学研究,2023,32(14):2673-2676.

引用本文

李国蓉, 朱敏, 卢文凤, 杨润清, 代修玲, 护理风险管理模式在急危重症病人转运中的应用效果[J]. 临床护理进展, 2024; 3: (11) : 1-4.