期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2024; 3: (9) ; 108-110 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jacn.20240385.

Study on the effect of high quality nursing service model in the nursing of orthopaedic patients with artificial hip replacement
优质护理服务模式在骨科人工髋关节置换患者护理中应用的效果研究

作者: 勉智辉 *

新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院 新疆乌鲁木齐

*通讯作者: 勉智辉,单位:新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院 新疆乌鲁木齐;

发布时间: 2024-09-30 总浏览量: 62

摘要

目的 分析优质护理用于骨科人工髋关节置换的价值。方法 随机均分2022年8月-2024年7月本院骨科接诊人工髋关节置换病人(n=62)。试验组采取优质护理,对照组行常规护理。对比Harris评分等指标。结果 关于疼痛缓解时间和住院时间:试验组短于对照组(P<0.05)。Harris评分:干预后,试验组高达(90.04±2.51)分,对照组只有(84.02±3.74)分,前者相较于后者更高(P<0.05)。满意度:试验组96.77%,对照组80.65%,前者相较于后者更高(P<0.05)。并发症:试验组3.23%,对照组22.58%,前者相较于后者更低(P<0.05)。结论 骨科人工髋关节置换用优质护理,病人的并发症更少,疼痛缓解时间更短,病情恢复更快,满意度也更高。

关键词: 优质护理;并发症;人工髋关节置换;满意度

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of quality care for orthopedic artificial hip replacement.
Methods Patients from August 2022 to July 2024 (n=62). The experimental group adopts high-quality care, and the control group does routine care. Compare the Harris score and other indicators.
Results Regarding duration of pain relief and length of stay: the test group was shorter than the control group (P <0.05). Harris Score: After the intervention, the test group was as high as (90.04 ± 2.51), and only (84.02 ± 3.74) in the control group, the former was higher than the latter (P <0.05). Satisfaction: 96.77% in the test group and 80.65% in the control group, the former was higher than the latter (P <0.05). Complications: 3.23% in the test group and 22.58% in the control group, the former was lower than the latter (P <0.05).
Conclusion   With high-quality care for orthopedic artificial hip replacement, patients have less complications, shorter pain relief time, faster recovery, and higher satisfaction.

Key words: Quality care; Complications; Artificial hip replacement; Satisfaction

参考文献 References

[1] 贾俊凌. 对接受人工髋关节置换术的老年股骨颈骨折患者进行优质护理的效果探究 [J]. 中国伤残医学,2023, 11(7):77-80. 

[2] 胡冬梅. 标准化优质护理联合预见性护理用于人工髋关节置换术护理对患者生活质量的影响研究[J]. 中国标准化,2023,17(20):297-300.

[3] RASHED, RAMY A. M., SEVENOAKS, HANNAH, CHOUDRY, QAISAR A., et al. Comparison of functional outcome of cemented total hip replacement versus cemented dual-mobility cup total hip replacement for the management of displaced femoral neck fractures in the active elderly patients[J]. Hip international: the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy,2021,31(5):683-690. 

[4] 周永芹. 优质护理服务对老年股骨颈骨折人工髋关节置换护理效果及生活质量的影响[J]. 医学食疗与健康,2021,19(19):194,198.

[5] 王兰,杨凯艳. 优质中医护理对人工髋关节置换术后疼痛及功能恢复的影响[J]. 西部中医药,2021,34(4):135-137. 

[6] 邓旭,陈洁(通讯作者),吴丹,等. 优质护理服务模式在人工髋关节置换术患者护理中应用的效果评价[J]. 健康管理,2021,24(12):19,27.

[7] 罗颖. 优质护理对人工髋关节置换术患者功能活动依从性的影响研究[J]. 中国伤残医学,2021,29(18):86-87. 

[8] 吕春梅. 优质护理联合预见性护理用于人工髋关节置换术护理对患者生活质量的影响[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2021, 29(18):94-95. 

[9] 徐琳. 对接受人工髋关节置换术的老年股骨颈骨折患者进行优质护理的效果探究[J]. 当代医药论丛,2020, 18(7): 254-255. 

[10] 陈燕. 优质护理服务模式在骨科人工髋关节置换患者护理中应用的效果研究[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2020,5(21):20,39.

[11] 杨开欣,廖化敏,周霞,等. 优质护理对人工髋关节置换术患者功能锻炼依从性的影响观察[J]. 母婴世界,2021, 19(11): 243.

引用本文

勉智辉, 优质护理服务模式在骨科人工髋关节置换患者护理中应用的效果研究[J]. 临床护理进展, 2024; 3: (9) : 108-110.