期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2024; 3: (8) ; 166-169 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jacn.20240349.

Explore the application effect of evidence-based nursing in spinal disease nursing
探究循证护理在脊柱疾病护理中的应用效果

作者: 刘媚媚 *

河池市宜州区中医医院 广西河池

*通讯作者: 刘媚媚,单位:河池市宜州区中医医院 广西河池;

发布时间: 2024-08-31 总浏览量: 65

摘要

目的 分析脊柱疾病护理用循证护理所起到的作用。方法 随机均分2022年6月-2024年5月本院接诊脊柱疾病病人(n=94)。试验组采取循证护理,对照组行常规护理。对比VAS评分等指标。结果 关于脊柱疾病认知度:试验组高达(92.03±3.16)分,对照组只有(69.47±6.51)分,分析后发现:试验组数据更高(P<0.05)。VAS评分:干预后:试验组低至(3.05±0.84)分,对照组高达(4.93±0.97)分,分析后发现:试验组数据更低(P<0.05)。满意度和护理效果:试验组95.74%、97.87%,对照组80.85%、82.98%,分析后发现:试验组数据更高(P<0.05)。并发症:试验组4.26%,对照组17.02%,分析后发现:试验组数据更低(P<0.05)。结论 脊柱疾病护理用循证护理,效果显著,病人的满意度也更高,并发症更少,疼痛感减轻更加显著。

关键词: 循证护理;VAS评分;脊柱疾病;并发症

Abstract

Objective To analyze the role of evidence-based nursing for spinal diseases.
Methods From June 2022 to May 2024 (n=94). The experimental group adopts evidence-based care, and the control group does routine care. Comparast: VAS score.
Results Regarding the awareness of spinal disease: up to (92.03 ± 3.16) in the test group and only (69.47±6.51) in the control group. After analysis, the data in the test group were higher (P <0.05). VAS score: After intervention: as low as (3.05±0.84) in the test group and as high as (4.93±0.97) in the control group. After analysis, the data in the test group were lower (P <0.05). Satisfaction and nursing effect: 95.74% and 97.87% in the test group, 80.85% and 82.98% in the control group. After analysis, the data in the test group were higher (P <0.05). Complications: 4.26% test group, 17.02% control group, after analysis: lower data in the test group (P<0.05).
Conclusion   Evidence-based care, higher patient satisfaction, fewer complications and more significant pain reduction.

Key words: Evidence-based nursing; VAS score; Spinal disease; Complications

参考文献 References

[1] 王小娟,包慧仙,沈希. 循证护理在脊柱疾病护理中的效果[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志,2022,7(17):95-97,94.

[2] 应银燕,王筱萍,杨爱玲. 循证护理在强直性脊柱炎患者疾病活动性和功能改善中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(22):3034-3038. 

[3] 刘华,吕艳艳,韩琪,等. 基于King达标理论的心理护理结合循证理论功能锻炼在强直性脊柱炎延续性护理中的应用价值[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2024,9(18):130-133. 

[4] ANDERSON, BRIAN R., MCCLELLAN, W. STEVE, LONG, CYNTHIA R.. Risk of Treatment Escalation in Recipients vs Nonrecipients of Spinal Manipulation for Musculoskeletal Cervical Spine Disorders: An Analysis of Insurance Claims[J]. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics: JMPT,2021,44(5):372-377. 

[5] 应银燕,王筱萍,杨爱玲. 基于循证的"一病一品"康复护理方案在强直性脊柱炎患者中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2021,27(19):2609-2613. 

[6] 黎琼. 精准护理指导下加速康复外科护理在脊髓脊柱疾病患者围手术期中的应用价值[J]. 中国冶金工业医学杂志,2024,41(3):289-290.

[7] 李碧波,刘涛,李娜. 加速康复外科理念在行脊柱融合术腰椎退行性疾病患者护理中的应用[J]. 新乡医学院学报,2022,39(11):1068-1073.

[8] 马喜宁,白艳娟,孔思铭,等. 强直性脊柱炎患者运动指导方案的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华护理杂志,2023,58(7): 864 -870.

[9] 尹会. 腰椎退行性疾病患者脊柱融合术后康复护理中联合运动疗法的效果分析[J]. 黑龙江医学,2023,47(12): 1498-1500. 

[10] 陈丽,孙常磊,尉世同,等. 延续性护理对强直性脊柱炎患者出院后自我管理及疾病活动度影响的研究[J]. 滨州医学院学报,2022,45(5):381-384.

引用本文

刘媚媚, 探究循证护理在脊柱疾病护理中的应用效果[J]. 临床护理进展, 2024; 3: (8) : 166-169.