摘要
目的 分析脑血管病介入治疗用介入护理的价值。方法 随机均分2022年3月-2024年2月本科接诊脑血管病病人（n=82）。试验组介入治疗期间采取介入护理，对照组行常规护理。对比sf-36评分等指标。结果 关于并发症：试验组2.44%，对照组14.63%，比较发现：试验组数据更低（P＜0.05）。sf-36评分：干预后，试验组达到（89.04±3.51）分，但对照组仅（81.35±4.28）分，比较发现：试验组数据更高（P＜0.05）。总有效率：试验组达到97.56%，但对照组仅82.93%，比较发现：试验组数据更高（P＜0.05）。结论 脑血管病介入治疗用介入护理，病人预后更好，并发症更少，满意度更高，护理效果提升也更加明显。
关键词： 脑血管病；生活质量；介入护理；并发症
Abstract
Objective To analyze the value of interventional nursing for cerebrovascular disease. Methods The patients with cerebrovascular disease were randomly assigned from March 2022 to February 2024 (n=82). The experimental group took interventional nursing during interventional treatment, and the control group took routine nursing. Compare sf-36 score and other indicators. Results The complications were 2.44% in the experimental group and 14.63% in the control group, and it was found that the data in the experimental group was lower (P < 0.05). sf-36 score: After intervention, the experimental group reached (89.04±3.51) score, but the control group was only (81.35±4.28) score, and the experimental group's score was higher (P < 0.05). The total effective rate was 97.56% in the experimental group, but only 82.93% in the control group, which was higher in the experimental group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Interventional nursing for cerebrovascular disease has better prognosis, less complications, higher satisfaction, and more obvious improvement in nursing effect.
Key words： Cerebrovascular disease; Quality of life; Interventional nursing; Complication
参考文献 References
[1] 胡瑞虹,刘梦焦,何琳. 综合护理对神经介入治疗缺血性脑血管病患者的干预效果[J]. 现代医学与健康研究（电子版）,2019,3(4):89-90.
[2] 高敏,王青芬,李飞,等. 基于量化评估策略的预见性护理在脑血管病介入治疗患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2023,29(13):65-68.
[3] 闫静. 集束化护理在介入治疗缺血性脑血管病中的应用[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2021,12(19):152-155.
[4] MITSUTAKE, AKIHIKO, MATSUMOTO, HIDEYUKI, HATANO, KEIKO, et al. Lenalidomide-Induced Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease in Polyneuropathy, Organomeg-aly, Endocrinopathy, Monoclonal Gammopa-thy, and Skin Changes Syndrome[J]. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: The official journal of National Stroke Association,2018,27(6):E102-E103.
[5] 华佳佳. 以问题导向的综合护理在急性缺血性脑血管病患者介入治疗中的影响[J]. 辽宁医学杂志,2023, 37(1): 99-102.
[6] 郭文秀,欧阳坤. 介入护理在脑血管病介入治疗患者中的应用效果探讨[J]. 婚育与健康,2021,28(23):163-164.
[7] 林素芬. 心理护理干预对脑血管病患者介入治疗效果的影响[J]. 按摩与康复医学,2017,8(21):75-77.
[8] 蒋鹏鹏,马晓灵,刘媛媛,等. 介入护理在脑血管病介入治疗中的效果及影响[J]. 养生保健指南,2023(24):160-162.
[9] 陈小红. 探讨脑血管病患者介入治疗术中行护理干预的效果及其对并发症发生率影响[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘（连续型电子期刊）,2020,20(79):149-150.
[10] 任会勤,陈清亮. 介入护理对心脑血管介入治疗患者治疗效果、负性情绪及生活质量的影响[J]. 黑龙江医学, 2023, 47(21):2670-2672.
[11] 李艳丽. 介入护理在脑血管病介入治疗中的效果分析及对患者生活质量的影响[J]. 中国医学创新,2021, 18(13): 89-93.