摘要
目的 探究不同延续性护理服务在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿中的应用价值。方法 研究时间2023年1月~2024年1月，从中随机抽选出100例早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿，分组方式选择：抽签法。将100例患儿随机分为对照组（一对一电话随访延续性护理）、观察组（在对照组基础上加以线上延续性护理），50例/组。对比2组早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿护理前后生长发育指标、2组家长护理知识了解程度、患儿家属满意度。结果 护理前，2组早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿生长发育指标对比均无统计学意义：P＞0.05；护理三个月后，观察组早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿生长发育各项指标均优于对照组，数据对比结果（P＜0.05）。而且观察组患儿家属知识了解度、护理技能掌握程度均高于对照组（P＜0.05）。而且观察组患者家属的护理满意度高于对照组：P＜0.05。结论 通过线上和线下共同的延续性护理服务，能够明显提升早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿家属的护理能力，保证家庭护理服务质量，有助于改善患儿生长发育，保证患儿家属的满意度。
关键词： 不同延续性护理；早产儿；呼吸窘迫综合征；护理满意度
Abstract
Objective To explore the value of different continuity care services in children with respiratory distress syndrome. Methods From January 2023 to January 2024,100 premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome were randomly selected, and group selection: lottery method. One hundred children were randomly divided into control group (one-on-one telephone follow-up continuation care), observation group (online continuation care on the basis of control group), and 50 cases / group. Compared with the growth and development indicators of children with respiratory distress syndrome, the degree of nursing knowledge of two groups, and the satisfaction of families. Results Before nursing, the indicators of two premature infants showed no statistical significance: P> 0.05; three months after nursing, the indicators of premature infants were better than those of the control group, and the comparison results (P <0.05). Moreover, the knowledge knowledge and nursing skills of the children in the observation group were higher than that of the control group (P <0.05). Moreover, the nursing satisfaction of the families in the observation group was higher than that of the control group: P <0.05. Conclusion Through the common online and offline continuous nursing services, the nursing ability of the families of premature children with respiratory distress syndrome can be significantly improved, the quality of family nursing services can be guaranteed, the growth and development of children, and the satisfaction of the families can be guaranteed.
Key words： Different continuity of care; Premature infants; Respiratory distress syndrome; Nursing satisfaction
参考文献 References
[1] 张欢,刘永芳,田金花. 不同延续性护理方式在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用[J]. 卫生职业教育,2022,40(15): 147-149.
[2] 张曦,魏淑榕,高锐,等. 基于时机理论的中青年永久性肠造口患者心理体验和护理服务需求的质性研究[J]. 福建医药杂志,2019,41(4):139-142.
[3] 刘瑛,龚放华. 98例矽肺合并慢阻肺患者奥马哈系统的延续护理应用及评价[J]. 工业卫生与职业病,2020,46(3): 254-255.
[4] 卓瑞燕,肖惠文,王珊珊,等. 基于互联网的延续性护理在早产儿随访中的应用效果[J]. 福建医药杂志,2023,45(4): 157-159.
[5] 张雪. 探讨袋鼠式延续性护理对早产儿生理指标及体格发育的影响[J]. 中国社区医师,2021,37(32):152-153.
[6] 张扬,刘娟,黄萍,等. 袋鼠式延续性护理对早产儿生理指标及体格发育的影响[J]. 护理管理杂志,2020,20(2): 112 -116.
[7] 金晶. 产后延续性护理对产褥期母婴并发症发生率及满意度影响[J]. 中国药物与临床,2019,19(13):2307-2309.
[8] 谢妩鸿,钟海燕,谢兰芳. 综合护理干预对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2023,29(11):149-151.
[9] 李雪美,吴卫英,罗琼,等. 整体护理在经鼻间歇正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的干预效果研究[J]. 黑龙江医药,2023,36(1):243-246.
[10] 刘智慧. 精细化护理对新生儿重症肺炎伴呼吸衰竭干预的影响[J]. 河南医学高等专科学校学报,2023,35(3): 322-325.
[11] 黄小满,李小平. 优质护理干预在鼻塞式CPAP治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用[J]. 临床医学工程,2022, 29(6):861-862.
[12] 郭玉珍,练素斌. 集束护理干预策略对呼吸窘迫综合征气管插管新生儿机械通气时间及VAP风险的影响[J]. 中外医疗,2022,41(30):165-168.
[13] 陈鑫蓓,蔡慧婷,张明,等. 集束化护理干预措施预防新生儿呼吸机相关肺炎的临床效果评价分析[J]. 当代临床医刊,2022,35(2):91-92.
[14] 温金玲,郑凤钗. 早产新生儿使用无创呼吸机的临床护理干预效果及并发症发生率分析[J]. 智慧健康,2022, 8(28): 206-209.
[15] 苏玉春, 蔡雅茹, 庄坤英. 集束化护理干预在一氧化氮联合呼吸机治疗新生儿呼吸衰竭中的应用[J]. 中西医结合护理（中英文）,2022,8(9):187-189.