Application effect analysis of predictive nursing in nursing of phalangeal fracture
预见性护理在指骨骨折护理中的应用效果分析

摘要

目的 本文针对预见性护理在指骨骨折护理中的应用价值展开分析研讨，旨在推进此领域研究的发展进程，为临床提供切实参考依据，为广大患者恢复健康形成促进。方法 设计一项随机对照单盲临床试验，启动期限为2022年11月至2023年4月，纳入样本为本时段院内收治的指骨骨折患者，人数共计80例，受试者将按照1∶1比例随机分为两个小组，实施常规护理服务的小组定义为参照组，划入人数40例；实施预见性护理服务的小组定义为研究组，划入人数40例，而后对相关数据展开收集整理，对相关资料展开统计分析，对临床干预效果展开比对阐述。具体比对方式采用：焦虑评分量表（SAS）、抑郁评分量表（SDS）、生理疼痛感受（NRS）评分表、生活自理能力（ADL）评分表进行评估；具体比对范围包括：SAS、SDS、NRS、ADL评分、住院时间、并发症发生率、恢复情况、护理满意度。结果 患者类别相同，采纳方案不同，所获效果也随之不同，研究组在上述指标数据的体现上，均更显优异，P值可达小于0.05标准，具备可比价值，值得探讨。结论 对于指骨骨折患者而言，在其临床护理方案的横向选择中，建议优先采纳研究组实施方案，不仅能有效缓解患者焦虑、抑郁情绪，生理疼痛感，促进患者自理能力的提高，还可极大降低并发症发生几率、缩短住院时间、提高患者指骨骨折恢复速度，提高护理满意度。

Abstract

Objective This article analyzes and discusses the application value of predictive nursing in the nursing of phalangeal fractures, aiming to promote the development of research in this field, provide practical reference for clinical practice, and promote the recovery of health for patients.
Methods A randomized controlled single blind clinical trial was designed, with a start period from November 2022 to April 2023. A total of 80 patients with phalangeal fractures admitted to the hospital during this period were included as the sample. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. The group receiving routine nursing services was defined as the reference group, with 40 patients included; The group responsible for implementing predictive nursing services is defined as a research group, consisting of 40 individuals. Relevant data is then collected and organized, and statistical analysis is conducted on the relevant information. Clinical intervention effects are compared and explained. The specific comparison method is to use the Anxiety Rating Scale (SAS), Depression Rating Scale (SDS), Physiological Pain Perception Scale (NRS), and Self care Ability (ADL) scale for evaluation; The specific comparison scope includes SAS, SDS, NRS, ADL score, length of hospital stay, incidence of complications, recovery status, and nursing satisfaction.
Results With the same patient category and different adoption plans, the results obtained also vary. The research group showed better performance in the above indicator data, with a P-value of less than 0.05 standard, which has comparable value and is worth exploring.
Conclusion   For patients with phalangeal fractures, it is recommended to prioritize the implementation plan of the research group in the horizontal selection of their clinical nursing plan. This not only effectively relieves anxiety, depression, physiological pain, and promotes the improvement of self-care ability, but also greatly reduces the incidence of complications, shortens hospitalization time, improves the recovery speed of phalangeal fractures, and improves nursing satisfaction.