期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2024; 3: (2) ; 4-7 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jacn.20240042.

Study on the effect of health education nursing intervention and routine nursing in the nursingof vaginitis patients
健康教育护理干预与常规护理在阴道炎病人护理中的效果研究

作者: 张华彬 *

西北大学附属医院 西安市第三医院 陕西西安

*通讯作者: 张华彬,单位:西北大学附属医院 西安市第三医院 陕西西安;

发布时间: 2024-02-20 总浏览量: 125

摘要

目的 本文针对阴道炎病人的护理作出分析,主要研究健康教育护理干预与常规护理的效果。方法根据本院收治的阴道炎患者,从2023年1月~12月期间抽选88例用作研究对象,以患者自愿加入方式,分别分为常规组(44例,常规护理),干预组(44例,健康教育护理干预),分析比较2组患者经过不同护理干预的效果。结果 护理前,患者心理状态(SAS、SDS)评分进行评估,2组相比没有显著差异,(p>0.05),护理后负面情绪明显减轻,干预组两项评分比常规组更低(p<0.05);2组患者的健康知识掌握情况(病因病机、治疗方式、健康生活、不良反应预防),相比之下,干预组各项掌握率均高于常规组,(p<0.05);通过评价患者护理后的生活质量(物质生活、躯体、社会、生理)各项评分,干预组相比常规组更优,(p<0.05);相比2组护理满意度,干预组:97.73%,常规组:81.82%,可见97.73%显著高于81.82%,(p<0.05)。结论 对于阴道炎病人的护理,健康教育护理干预要比常规护理的应用效果更好,利于患者掌握疾病相关知识,改善其负面情绪与生活状态,值得推广。

关键词: 健康教育护理干预;常规护理;阴道炎

Abstract

Objective To analyze the nursing of patients with vaginitis, mainly study the effect of health education nursing intervention and routine nursing.
Methods According to the patients with vaginitis admitted to our hospital, 88 cases were selected from January to December 2023 as research objects, and were divided into routine group (44 cases, routine nursing) and intervention group (44 cases, health education nursing intervention) by means of voluntary participation of patients.
Results Before nursing, the psychological state (SAS, SDS) scores of the patients were evaluated, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). After nursing, the negative emotions were obviously alleviated, and the two scores in the intervention group were lower than those in the conventional group (p < 0.05). The mastery of health knowledge (etiology, pathogenesis, treatment, healthy life, prevention of adverse reactions) in 2 groups was higher in the intervention group than in the conventional group (p < 0.05). The scores of quality of life (physical life, physical life, social and physiological) after nursing were evaluated, and the intervention group was better than the conventional group (p < 0.05). Compared with the two groups, the nursing satisfaction was 97.73% in the intervention group and 81.82% in the conventional group, indicating that 97.73% was significantly higher than 81.82% (p < 0.05).
Conclusion   For the care of patients with vaginitis, health education nursing intervention is better than the application of conventional nursing, which is conducive to patients mastering disease-related knowledge, improving their negative emotions and life status, and is worth promoting.

Key words: Health education nursing intervention; Routine nursing; Colpitis

参考文献 References

[1] 赵玉花.健康教育对妇科阴道炎患者护理干预效果及不良心理分析[J].婚育与健康,2023,29(22):139-141.

[2] 祖琳娜.阴道炎患者采取健康教育联合全程优质护理干预的效果分析[J].中国实用乡村医生杂志,2023,30(11): 39 -42+46.

[3] 李克仙.健康教育护理干预在妇科阴道炎患者护理中的应用效果分析[J].婚育与健康,2023,29(19):112-114.

[4] 杨海英.健康教育护理干预在妇科阴道炎患者护理中的作用效果观察[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志,2020,7(36): 91-92.

[5] 张璐璐,胡明芳.健康教育用于阴道炎护理中的临床效果评价[J].妇幼护理, 2022(8):1738-1740,1747.

引用本文

张华彬, 健康教育护理干预与常规护理在阴道炎病人护理中的效果研究[J]. 临床护理进展, 2024; 3: (2) : 4-7.