Effect of rehabilitation nursing intervention on ICU patients with multiple traumaand its impact on complications and quality of life
康复护理干预对ICU多发性创伤患者的效果及对并发症、生存质量的影响分析

摘要

目的 分析ICU多发性创伤患者，对其实施康复护理干预措施后，患者的并发症与生活质量情况。方法 本次研究，以2020年11月-2022年11月为研究阶段，以院内诊疗的94例ICU多发性创伤患者，依据数字抽签，94例研究对象均分成两组，一组看作参照组，一组视为观察组，每组47，参照组，以常规干预方案，观察组，予以康复护理干预，评比两组干预成效。结果 从两组患者并发症情况分析，参照组，综合发生率21%（10/47），观察组，综合发生率4%（2/47），组间差异对比，数据变化明显，P＜0.05，存在统计学意义；从生活质量评分对比，入住ICU当日，患者各项数据变化较小，组间差异化较小，P＞0.05，无统计学意义；入住IUC96h后，患者各项数据变化极大，观察组患者各项评分更优，组间对比，差异化明显，P＜0.05，具备统计学意义；采取不同护理方案，两组患者临床疗效差异化极大，参照组，治疗有效率89%（37/47），观察组，治疗有效率98%（46/47），由数据对比可知，观察组综合效果更强，组间对比，P＜0.05，具备统计学意义。结论 ICU多发性创伤患者，采取康复干预措施，可以降低并发症，提高患者生活质量，具有临床应用价值。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the complications and quality of life of patients with multiple trauma in ICU after implementing rehabilitation nursing interventions.
Methods In this study, November 2020 - November 2022 was taken as the research period, and 94 ICU patients with multiple trauma were diagnosed and treated in the hospital. According to the digital lottery, the 94 subjects were divided into two groups, one group was regarded as the reference group, and the other group was regarded as the reference group. The reference group used the conventional intervention program while the observation group used rehabilitation nursing intervention, and evaluate the intervention effect of the two groups.
Results From the analysis of the complications of the two groups of patients, the comprehensive incidence rate of the reference group was 21% (10/47), and that of the observation group was 4% (2/47). The difference between the groups was compared, and the data changed significantly, P< 0.05, there is statistical significance; from the comparison of the quality of life scores, the data of the patients on the day of admission to the ICU has little change, and the difference between the groups is small, P>0.05, there is no statistical significance; after 96 hours of admission to the IUC, the data of the patients have changed. The scores of patients in the observation group were better, and the difference between the groups was obvious, P<0.05, which was statistically significant; different nursing programs were adopted, and the clinical curative effect of the two groups of patients was very different. In the reference group, the treatment efficiency was 89% (37/47); in the observation group, the treatment effective rate was 98% (46/47). From the data comparison, the comprehensive effect of the observation group is stronger, and the comparison between groups, P<0.05, has statistical significance.
Conclusion   Rehabilitation intervention measures for patients with multiple trauma in ICU can reduce complications and improve the quality of life of patients, which has clinical application value.