摘要
目的 在颅内动脉机械取栓术后患者中，实施优质性护理干预，评价效果。方法 研究对象是80例神经内科颅内动脉机械取栓术后患者，均于2019年7月~2022年9月期间就诊。普通干预组（40例）：普通护理。优质性护理干预组（40例）：优质性护理干预。研究效果。结果 优质性护理干预组护理1周后的HAMA评分、神经功能缺损程度评分均更低[（6.08±1.47）分、（11.05±1.04）分，分别与普通干预组的（9.98±2.07）分、（19.86±2.14）分对比]（p＜0.05）。优质性护理干预组护理1周后的生活质量（生理、心理、社会关系、环境）评分均更高[（16.77±3.21）分、（17.35±2.27）分、（15.22±3.13）分、（15.31±2.68）分，与普通干预组（13.56±2.18）分、（14.88±1.43）分、（13.87±2.19）分、（13.27±1.44）分比较]（p＜0.05）。优质性护理干预组护理1周后的临床护理满意率均更高[95.00%，与普通干预组77.50%对比]（p＜0.05）。结论 颅内动脉机械取栓术后患者中，实施优质性护理干预，效果更好。
关键词： 急性脑卒中；颅内动脉机械取栓术；优质性护理干预；满意度
Abstract
Objective To implement high-quality nursing intervention in patients after intracranial artery mechanical thrombectomy, and to evaluate the effect. Methods The study subjects were 80 patients after intracranial arterial mechanical thrombectomy, all were seen between July 2019 and September 2022. General intervention group (40 cases): general care. Quality nursing intervention group (40 cases): quality nursing intervention. research effect. Results The HAMA score and degree of neurological deficit were lower [(6.08 ± 1.47) and (11.05 ± 1.04) than (9.98 ± 2.07) and (19.86 ± 2.14) in the general intervention group] (p <0.05). Quality of life (physical, psychological, social relationship, environment) was higher after 1 week in the intervention group [(16.77 ± 3.21), 17.35 ± 2.27), (15.22 ± 3.13), 15.31 ± 2.68) (13.31 ± 2.18), (14.43), (13.87 ± 2.19), (13.27 ± 1.44) with the general intervention group] (p <0.05). The satisfaction rate of clinical nursing was higher in the quality nursing intervention group [95.00%, compared with 77.50% in the general intervention group] (p <0.05). Conclusion Quality nursing intervention after mechanical thrombectomy is better.
Key words： Acute stroke; Intracranial artery mechanical thrombectomy; High-quality nursing intervention; satisfaction
参考文献 References
[1] 肖蓓,拾丹丹,张文等.风险预警评估指导下的规范化护理对急性脑梗死机械取栓术患者的影响[J].护理实践与研究, 2022,19(16):2475-2478.
[2] 林育微,罗世炜,黄少曼等.围术期循证支持对机械取栓术治疗的急性脑梗死患者神经功能和负性情绪的影响[J].中国医药科学,2021,11(24):122-125.
[3] 胡玲玲.综合护理在颅内动脉机械取栓术后患者中的应用[J].中国城乡企业卫生,2021,36(10):210-212.
[4] 陈玉杰.优质护理对静脉溶栓桥接动脉取栓患者效果[J].中国城乡企业卫生,2020,35(12):203-204.
[5] 高静.对一例接受机械取栓术的急性脑基底动脉闭塞所致缺血性脑卒中患者进行优质护理的效果[J].当代医药论丛,2020,18(13):255-256.
[6] 刘岩,齐宝柱,闫丽娜等.综合干预在颅内动脉机械取栓术后患者中的应用效果评价[J].河北医学, 2019, 25(03): 685-687.
[7] 刘珊珊,封晓燕.急性脑梗死机械取栓术围手术期护理效果评价[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2018,18(99):288.
[8] 郭红梅,李丽,晋子纯等.Solitaire AB支架机械取栓治疗急性脑梗死病人围术期护理的研究进展[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2018,16(17):2519-2522.
[9] 陈静杰.急性脑梗死机械取栓术围手术期护理干预对策探究[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2018,3(37):56+62.
[10] 曲江.急性脑梗死机械取栓术围手术期护理效果及对患者术后NIHSS评分的作用分析[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2018,3(29):89+91.