The application of continuous care under quantitative evaluation strategy in patientswith chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
量化评估策略下的延续性护理在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的应用

摘要

目的 针对量化评估策略下的延续性护理在慢性阻塞性肺疾病（COPD）患者中的应用价值展开分析。方法 选取我院2021年2月-2022年2月期间收治的116例COPD患者作为研究对象，采用抛币法分为对照组和研究组，各58例，对照组给予常规护理，研究组给予量化评估策略下的延续性护理，两组患者护理周期为3个月。比较两组患者护理前后焦虑自评量表（SAS）、抑郁自评量表（SDS）评分及第1秒用力呼气末容积占用力肺活量比值（FEV1/FVC）与6分钟行走距离（6-MWD）。结果 护理前，两组患者各项评分差异对比无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；护理后，研究组SAS、SDS两项评分均低于对照组（P＜0.05）；FEV1/FVC、6-MWD优于对照组（P＞0.05）。结论 在COPD患者中应用量化评估策略下的延续性护理，有助于缓解患者负性情绪，改善患者肺功能，对促进患者疾病康复有重要价值，值得临床推广及应用。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the application value of continuous care under quantitative evaluation strategies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Methods 116 COPD patients admitted to our hospital from February 2021 to February 2022 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into a control group and a study group using the coin toss method, with 58 patients in each group. The control group received routine care, while the study group received continuous care under a quantitative evaluation strategy. The nursing period for the two groups of patients was 3 months. The scores of SAS, SDS, FEV1/FVC and 6-minute walking distance (6-MWD) before and after nursing were compared between the two groups.
Results Before nursing, there was no statistically significant difference in scores between the two groups of patients (P>0.05); After nursing, the SAS and SDS scores of the study group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05); FEV1/FVC and 6-MWD were better than the control group (P>0.05).
Conclusion   The application of continuous care under quantitative evaluation strategies in COPD patients can help alleviate negative emotions, improve lung function, and promote disease recovery. It is of great value and worthy of clinical promotion and application.