期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2023; 2: (4) ; 58-60 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jacn.20230157.

Effective nursing interventions to reduce nosocomial infections in patients undergoing fracture surgery
减少骨折手术患者医院感染的有效护理干预措施

作者: 田梦 *

保定市第二中心医院 河北保定

*通讯作者: 田梦,单位:保定市第二中心医院 河北保定;

发布时间: 2023-04-25 总浏览量: 201

摘要

目的 分析不同护理方案用于骨折手术中对降低病人医院感染率的作用。方法 对2021年3月-2023年2月本科接诊骨折手术病人(n=200)进行随机分组,试验和对照组各100人,前者采取综合护理,后者行常规护理。对比医院感染率等指标。结果 关于医院感染率,试验组数据1.0%,和对照组数据7.0%相比更低(P<0.05)。关于依从性这个指标:试验组数据98.0%,和对照组数据86.0%相比更高(P<0.05)。关于VAS评分:干预结束时:试验组数据(2.03±0.47)分,和对照组数据(3.52±0.68)分相比更低(P<0.05)。关于满意度:试验组数据99.0%,和对照组数据84.0%相比更高(P<0.05)。结论 骨折手术用综合护理,医院感染率更低,疼痛感减轻更加明显,依从性提升更为迅速,满意度也更高。

关键词: 医院感染;满意度;骨折手术;护理

Abstract

Objective To analyze the role of different nursing programs in fracture surgery in reducing the hospital infection rate of patients.
Methods Patients (n=200) from March 2021 to February 2023 were randomized, with 100 participants in the control group, with the former receiving comprehensive care and the latter receiving routine care. Compared with the hospital infection rate and other indicators.
Results Regarding the hospital infection rate, the test group data was 1.0%, lower than 7.0% in the control group (P <0.05). On compliance: 98.0% of the test group data was higher than 86.0% of the control group data (P <0.05). Regarding VAS score: end of the intervention: trial data (2.03 ± 0.47) and lower than the control data (3.52 ± 0.68) (P <0.05). On satisfaction: 99.0% in the test group, higher than 84.0% in the control group (P <0.05).
Conclusion   Comprehensive care for fracture surgery has a lower hospital infection rate, more obvious pain reduction, more rapid compliance improvement, and higher satisfaction rate.

Key words: Hospital infection; Satisfaction; Fracture surgery; Nursing

参考文献 References

[1] 江慧萍. 手术室护理管理对骨科手术医院感染的干预效果分析[J]. 家庭医药,2019(10):216.

[2] 周萍. 对接受手术治疗的脊柱骨折患者进行规范化手术室护理对其医院感染发生情况的影响[J]. 当代医药论丛,2020,18(19):178-180. 

[3] SHEN, JIELIANG, YANG, ZHENGYANG, FU, MENGYU, et al. The influence of topical use of tranexa-mic acid in reducing blood loss on early operation for thoracolumbar burst fracture: a randomized double-blind-ed controlled study[J]. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society,2021,30(10):3074-3080. 

[4] 陈维娜. 手术室护理管理对骨科手术医院感染的干预效果分析[J]. 养生保健指南,2020(19):185.

[5] 张晓非. 浅谈骨外科患者术后医院感染因素及围手术期干预措施[J]. 健康之友,2019(4):71.

[6] 邓丽华. 老年下肢骨折住院患者医院感染特点与危险因素分析[J]. 中外医疗,2022,41(9):150-153,176. 

[7] 邓丽华. 老年下肢骨折住院患者医院感染特点与危险因素分析[J]. 心理医生,2018,24(24):167-169.

[8] 王立梅. 减少骨折手术患者医院感染的护理干预有效方法探讨[J]. 糖尿病天地,2022,19(1):273-275.

[9] 徐怡帆. 围术期护理在老年股骨颈骨折手术患者中的应用[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2020,31(15):2488-2489.

[10] 何丽. 常规护理与整体护理干预模式在老年髋骨骨折手术护理中的应用效果[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2018,3(9):190-191. 

[11] 胡浪静. 探讨减少骨折手术患者医院感染的有效护理干预措施[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊),2021,21(13):339-340.

引用本文

田梦, 减少骨折手术患者医院感染的有效护理干预措施[J]. 临床护理进展, 2023; 2: (4) : 58-60.