Analysis of clinical effect of obstetric nursing intervention on women with premature rupture of membranes
产科护理干预对胎膜早破产妇的临床效果分析

摘要

目的 提出产科护理干预方案，将其用于胎膜早破，研究效果。方法 对象是胎膜早破产妇，病例数共80例，时间2021年4月~2022年4月。44例实施常规护理，纳入普通组；44例做好产科护理干预，纳入产科护理干预组。研究效果。结果 ①组间比较自然分娩率，产科护理干预组95.45%，普通组77.27%，产科护理干预组的自然分娩率更高（p＜0.05）。②组间比较不良妊娠结局率，产科护理干预组4.55%，普通组22.73%，产科护理干预组的不良妊娠结局率更低（p＜0.05）。③组间比较焦虑（HAMA）评分，护理后产科护理干预组（6.11±0.43）分，普通组（9.14±1.44）分，产科护理干预组的HAMA评分更低（p＜0.05）。④组间比较母婴不良事件发生率，产科护理干预组9.09%，普通组34.09%，产科护理干预组的不良妊娠结局率更低（p＜0.05）。⑤组间比较临床护理满意率，产科护理干预组95.45%，普通组77.27%，产科护理干预组的临床护理满意率更高（p＜0.05）。结论 将产科护理干预方案用于胎膜早破产妇，更利于妊娠结局改善，避免发生母婴并发症，缓解产妇的焦虑情绪，让产妇更满意。

Abstract

Objective To put forward the obstetric nursing intervention plan for premature rupture of membranes and study the effect.
Methods The subjects were parturients with premature rupture of membranes, with a total of 80 cases, from April 2021 to April 2022. 44 patients received routine nursing and were included in the general group. 44 cases of obstetric nursing intervention were included in the obstetric nursing intervention group. Study the effects.
Results (1) The rate of natural delivery was 95.45% in the intervention group and 77.27% in the general group. The rate of natural delivery was higher in the intervention group (p < 0.05). ② The rate of adverse pregnancy outcome was 4.55% in the intervention group and 22.73% in the general group. The rate of adverse pregnancy outcome was lower in the intervention group (p < 0.05). (3) Inter-group comparative anxiety (HAMA) score was 6.11±0.43 points in the post-nursing obstetric care intervention group and 9.14±1.44 points in the general group, and the HAMA score in the obstetric care intervention group was lower (p < 0.05). (4) The incidence of adverse events between the two groups was 9.09% in the obstetric care intervention group and 34.09% in the general group, and the rate of adverse pregnancy outcome was lower in the obstetric care intervention group (p < 0.05). (5) Comparing the satisfaction rate of clinical nursing between groups, the obstetric nursing intervention group was 95.45% and the general group was 77.27%, and the obstetric nursing intervention group had a higher satisfaction rate of clinical nursing (p < 0.05).
Conclusion   The application of obstetric nursing intervention scheme in premature rupture of membranes is more conducive to improving pregnancy outcome, avoiding maternal and infant complications, relieving maternal anxiety and making the mothers more satisfied.