期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2022; 1: (6) ; 101-103 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jacn.20220287.

Effect of humanized nursing model in elderly patients with respiratory failure and its influence on lung function
人性化护理模式在老年呼吸衰竭患者护理中的效果及肺功能影响分析

作者: 杨婧 *

山西省晋城市人民医院 山西晋城

*通讯作者: 杨婧,单位:山西省晋城市人民医院 山西晋城;

发布时间: 2022-12-15 总浏览量: 369

摘要

目的 分析人性化护理用于老年呼吸衰竭的价值。方法 对2020年8月-2022年8月本科接诊老年呼吸衰竭病人(n=82)进行随机分组,试验和对照组各41人,前者采取人性化护理,后者行常规护理。对比FVC等指标。结果 关于FVC和FEV1,干预结束时:试验组数据分别是(3.01±0.29)L、(2.66±0.26)L,和对照组(2.65±0.27)L、(2.29±0.31)L相比更高(P<0.05)。关于二氧化碳分压和动脉血氧分压,干预结束时:试验组数据分别是(40.36±9.25)mmHg、(83.47±14.23)mmHg,和对照组数据(61.94±11.78)mmHg、(62.59±9.36)mmHg相比更好(P<0.05)。关于sf-36评分,干预结束时:试验组数据(87.13±2.65)分,和对照组数据(81.59±3.04)分相比更高(P<0.05)。关于满意度:试验组数据97.56%,和对照组80.49%相比更高(P<0.05)。结论 老年呼吸衰竭用人性化护理,病人的预后更好,肺功能与血气分析指标改善更加明显,满意度提升更为迅速。

关键词: 呼吸衰竭;肺功能;人性化护理;生活质量

Abstract

Objective To analyze the value of humanized nursing for senile respiratory failure.
Methods: From August 2020 to August 2022, 82 elderly patients (n=82) with respiratory failure were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 41 patients in each group. The former received humanized nursing, while the latter received routine nursing. Compare FVC and other indicators.
Results At the end of intervention, the data of FVC and FEV1 in the experimental group were (3.01±0.29) L and (2.66±0.26) L, respectively, which were higher than those in the control group (2.65±0.27) L and (2.29±0.31) L (P < 0.05). For partial pressure of carbon dioxide and partial pressure of arterial oxygen, at the end of intervention, the data of the experimental group were (40.36±9.25) mmHg and (83.47±14.23) mmHg, respectively, which were better than those of the control group (61.94±11.78) mmHg and (62.59±9.36) mmHg (P < 0.05). Regarding the SF-36 score, at the end of the intervention, the score of the experimental group (87.13±2.65) was higher than that of the control group (81.59±3.04) (P < 0.05). About satisfaction: the data of the experimental group was 97.56%, which was higher than that of the control group (80.49%) (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   The elderly respiratory failure with humanized nursing, the patient's prognosis is better, the pulmonary function and blood gas analysis index improvement is more obvious, the satisfaction is more rapid.

Key words: Respiratory failure; Lung function; Humanized nursing; The quality of life

参考文献 References


[1] 孙会玲,.人性化护理对老年呼吸衰竭患者心理状态及护理满意度的影响[J].黑龙江中医药,2020,49(5)

[2] 张国珺,.人性化护理干预对无创呼吸机治疗老年呼吸衰竭患者临床疗效及肺功能影响分析[J].医学理论与实践,2019,32(18)

[3] 胡火艳,.人性化护理对老年呼吸衰竭患者康复心理状态的临床效果观察[J].双足与保健,2018,0(15)

[4] 高蕾,.人性化护理对老年呼吸衰竭患者心理状态的临床效果观察[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2019,0(A01)

[5] 雷晓霞,.人性化护理模式在老年呼吸衰竭患者中的应用价值探讨[J].基层医学论坛,2017,21(32)

[6] 芦志红,.人性化护理对老年呼吸衰竭患者心理状态及护理满意度的影响[J].国外医学:医学地理分册,2018,39(1)

[7] 林慧敏,.人性化护理模式在60例老年呼吸衰竭患者护理中的应用[J].按摩与康复医学,2017,8(15)

[8] 赵立美,.人性化护理模式在老年呼吸衰竭病人护理中的应用[J].护理研究:下旬版,2014,28(9)

[9] 贾利利,.人性化护理对老年呼吸衰竭患者心理状态及护理满意度的影响[J].首都食品与医药,2018,25(17)

[10] 曹先林,.人性化护理对重症肺炎呼吸衰竭患者使用无创呼吸机的影响[J].益寿宝典,2020,(6)

[11] 李芳,吴玮[1],.对老年慢性呼吸衰竭患者进行人性化护理的效果探究[J].当代医药论丛,2019,0(17)

引用本文

杨婧, 人性化护理模式在老年呼吸衰竭患者护理中的效果及肺功能影响分析[J]. 临床护理进展, 2022; 1: (6) : 101-103.