期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing. 2022; 1: (5) ; 120-122 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jacn.20220234.

Application of clinical nursing pathway in the nursing of severe burn patients
临床护理路径在重症烧伤患者护理中的应用分析

作者: 苑敬辉 *, 陈苗凤, 张敬敏

唐县中医医院 河北保定

唐县人民医院 河北保定

*通讯作者: 苑敬辉,单位:唐县中医医院 河北保定;

发布时间: 2022-09-15 总浏览量: 392

摘要

目的 研究临床护理路径在重症烧伤患者护理中的应用效果。方法 选取我院2021年02月-2022年02收治的80例重症烧伤患者,依据随机分组法,将其分为研究组与对照组,每组40例。对照组患者采用常规护理方式,研究组患者采用临床护理路径方式,对比两组疼痛程度与生命质量评分、护理满意度、并发症发生率。结果 护理后研究组VAS评分低于对照组,生命质量评分高于对照组;研究组护理满意度92.50%,对照组75.00%,研究组高于对照组;研究组并发症总发生率2.50%,对照组17.50%,研究组低于对照组,两组数据对比差异显著,P<0.05。结论 临床护理路径在重症烧伤患者中应用,可减轻患者疼痛程度,降低并发症发生率,提高患者的生命质量,继而提高护理满意度。

关键词: 临床护理路径;重症烧伤;疼痛程度;护理满意度

Abstract

Objective To study the effect of clinical nursing pathway in the nursing of severe burn patients.
Methods 80 patients with severe burns treated in our hospital from February 2021 to February 2022 were randomly divided into study group and control group, with 40 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with routine nursing, and the patients in the study group were treated with clinical nursing pathway. The degree of pain, quality of life score, nursing satisfaction and complication rate were compared between the two groups.
Results after nursing, the VAS score of the study group was lower than that of the control group, and the quality of life score was higher than that of the control group; The nursing satisfaction of the study group was 92.50%, and that of the control group was 75.00%, which was higher than that of the control group; The total incidence of complications in the study group was 2.50%, and that in the control group was 17.50%, which was lower than that in the control group. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).
Conclusion   the application of clinical nursing pathway in severe burn patients can reduce the degree of pain, reduce the incidence of complications, improve the quality of life of patients, and then improve nursing satisfaction.

Key words: Clinical nursing path; Severe burns; Degree of pain; Nursing satisfaction

参考文献 References

[1] 张瑞,任新颖.路径护理干预对重症烧伤患者急救期营养状态的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2021,6(6):137-139.

[2] 刘佳.临床护理路径在大面积烧伤患者护理中的应用[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2021,38(6):675-676.

[3] 陈洁盈,唐炼.重症烧伤患者急救期输液及营养的路径护理[J].中国继续医学教育,2020,12(13):164-166.

[4] 徐永秀,谢晓连,杜惠贞.临床护理路径在重症烧伤患者护理中的应用研究[J].智慧健康,2020,6(4):146-147.

[5] 郭文静,许晶,邵弘,等.临床护理路径在重症烧伤患者护理中的应用[J].糖尿病天地,2020,17(11):217.

[6] 张倩倩.临床护理路径在重症烧伤护理中的应用[J].医学信息,2019,32(z2):357-358.

[7] 樊晓燕.临床护理路径在重症烧伤护理中的应用分析[J].心理医生,2018,24(19):245-246.

[8] 张丽珍.临床护理路径在重症烧伤患者中的应用效果[J].医疗装备,2018,31(21):196-197.

[9] 黄洁清,黄坤静.临床护理路径在重症烧伤护理中的应用效果观察[J].中国继续医学教育,2018,10(12):177-179.

[10] 倪英.重症烧伤患者急救期输液及营养路径护理的效果[J].医疗装备,2018,31(16):177-178.

引用本文

苑敬辉, 陈苗凤, 张敬敏, 临床护理路径在重症烧伤患者护理中的应用分析[J]. 临床护理进展, 2022; 1: (5) : 120-122.